Oscar Sogandares G.
Incidentally today Saturday (Jan 8,2005) I had the opportunity to take part in a rally in Clayton (I hadn’t been there since base closure in 1999) just outside the new US consulate at Bldg 520 (and below Bldg, 519) behind which is planned the urban development project CL35 (not to mention the larger 45 hectare C43 lot beside the Cardenas River) which curiously bears the name “Hacienda Las Cruces” whose prime proponent for both is a Mr. Pasco (not Pazco), who is also the developer of the “Camino de Cruces” project behind the Chinese School in El Dorado (where there have also been complaints about environmental violations). It certainly seems this “gentleman” is in “love” with the area, especially the “wooded” areas.
All got underway
as planned with the purpose of creating a “human chain”. There were
aproximately around 300 plus including friend Ezequiel Miranda and the
group from Chiriquí against the Camino “anti-ecológico”, to reinforce
the
Our group
continuously chanted slogans as “los bosques no son para vender sino
para defender” which literally means “forests are not to be sold but
protected”. Since the late ARI had changed all the rules and in its
quest for new money is simply selling off to the best suitor all wooded
areas which were to become part of the Camino de
As soon as
everyone left we finally got the chance to become acquainted with the
“Cruces Trail” tract lying just behind Bldg. 519. Surprisingly not many
of us left for this venture after all this rally. We got off near Bldg
519 which presently is concession to the Caja del Seguro Social. There
we ventured along some uncut grass way along the slopes and entered into
the wooded area. About 50 meters into the forest we spotted a portion
of the Cruces Trail which was recently uncovered beneath leaves and soil
on the forest floor. If anyone who has trekked the Cruces Trail
especially along
Years ago when I
worked with the Army I would usually wonder about the trail lying
beneath the forest while parked in the 519 parking lot, so I suggested
we follow the pathway around the building to get there and do a little
“exploring”. There we found a “bivouac” for
From The Panama News
Background
Basically the law which deals with the forest areas
within the military bases has not been followed. IAW
the law which created Parque Nacional Camino de Cruces
the forests within Clayton were to automatically
become part of the National Park once the bases were
turned in (I actually saw signs within Clayton which
said such). But it so happened that the ARI
(Autoridad Region Interoceanica) recently has changed
all the rules changing the status of most wooded areas
within the former military bases into "urbanizables"
or fair game for developers. Right now the old growth
forest behind Bldg. 519 to include a very much ignored
portion of a historical tract of the "Cruces Trail"
behind Bldg. 519 which ironically the National Park is
supposed to protect lies just outside of the
protection of the park itself to be developed under
lot (CL-35) . Also that long wooded hill overlooking
Corozal West where deer have even been spotted in the
afternoon are in grave danger of disappearing as well
as all adjacent areas behind Cardenas lot (C-43).
I am also forwarding a copy of a
letter directed to President Martin Torrijos and the
different components of his govt. Please circulate
among all CZBrats. I would even say we must also
lobby even further to all International entities like
the UN and UNESCO (since a world treasure dating back
from 500 years and the California Gold Rush such as
the Cruces Trail is in peril of being destroyed
forever) as well as the US Congress and Government.
We must stop these mad "juega vivo" developers much in
the same way as we all stopped the former lady
president in her "anti-ecological" road folly.
For more information contact:
Oscar Sogandares G.
People to write protesting the planned development:
Dear Mr President and Honourable Ministers and Administrators of theRepublic of Panama. I would like to congratulate you on the progress you have made in combating poverty, corruption and environmental degradation within the first fewmonths of your administration. It is due to your commitment to sustainable development that brings the greatest good to greatest number of people over the longest period that I would like to turn your attention to the sale of the public forests of the reverted areas for private housing developments.I fully believe that this development is wrong for the following reasons: · It removes national patrimony into the hands of a few private owners, thereby ultimately increasing the gap between rich and poor and impeding real developmental progress that aims to decrease this gap · It will deforest areas that are known to be rich in biodiversity that are inhabited by endangered species recognized under Panamanian law, such as Geoffroy¹s tamarin and the yellow crowned Amazon. Furthermore the forests of Clayton are known to be inhabited by at least 5 species of vertebrate and several species of plant of which some are endemic, that are considered to be critically imperilled at the national level, yet no comprehensive study has been attempted to see if the forests in question harbor these species. · Deforestation will remove a critical link in the biological corridor for wildlife dispersal between Camino de Cruces National Park, Metropolitan National Park and other reverted area forests. · The housing development will desecrate a part of the "Camino de Cruces" an internationally important cultural monument, more than 400 years old and one of the first attempts to put a structure across the Isthmus. · Will impede current attempts to begin new industries based upon tourism and education that already use these particular forests. I would also like to turn your attention to the environmental assessment that was undertaken for one development, that was found to be "seriously flawed" by a panel of independent scientists for reasons that include flawed methodology, lack of quantitative data and inexact data including themisleading number of species which the forests are said to contain. Theassessment category of II that is was given is totally unjustified and is a misrepresentation of the quality and important habitat that these forests provide. The forests of the reverted areas are a national treasure, biologically, socially and culturally and could provide income through tourism andsustainable industries for many years to come. I believe that sale of these forests to private interests will be a step backwards for Panama¹sdevelopment and undo the good work that your administration is undertaking.
Please consider this case and reverse the sale of these lands and protect the forests of the reverted areas for all to enjoy. Sincerely yours,